GLASGOW Prestwick Spaceport was reaching for the stars last night after signing a deal with its big cousin in Houston that will enable it to share policies, processes and other information relating to space travel licensing and operations, as well as boosting the economy by hundreds of millions of pounds.
The Memo of Understanding (MoU) was signed as a delegation from Houston Spaceport and Rice Space Institute met representatives from the Scottish space industry and local politicians at Prestwick, which is aiming to strengthen its case to become the UK’s first spaceport.
Richard Jenner, director of Prestwick Spaceport and Arturo Machuca, Houston Spaceport’s general manager, signed the agreement that will boost the Scottish site’s hopes of eventually launching passenger space flights. It also marks the start of a process to develop global “best practice” for commercial space launch activities, safety and environmental standards.
Jenner said: “We couldn’t wish for a more experienced partner than Houston. They have a history of facilitating government-funded launches and it is exciting to be embarking on the move to commercial launches alongside them.
“This partnership will hopefully expedite the establishment of a spaceport at Prestwick, as soon as we have the guidance from the CAA [Civil Aviation Authority], DfT [Department for Transport] and UK Space Agency on what a regulatory framework will involve for UK spaceports. We would anticipate that we will have this clarity at some point in 2017.
“Glasgow Prestwick developing a spaceport in Scotland will bring huge economic benefits – up to £320 million towards our economy. This is before taking account of the further added value the spaceport, our partners in the developing aerospace campus around us and wider science and technology industries can gain from having access to NASA research and resources.”
Machuca added: “The pioneers who first made inroads in space travel and space exploration began as contestants in a race, but soon realised that any hope of safely and efficiently reaching those goals would require productive and valuable partnerships.
“As we begin the next steps in this ambitious endeavour, partnerships like this will benefit everyone, and will strengthen not only our assets and technology, but also our resolve to make commercial space travel a viable and valuable tool.”
David Alexander, Rice Space Institute, said it saw similarities between what was happening at Prestwick and Houston.
“Particularly exciting is the opportunity for the spaceports to act as catalysts to foster collaboration across the high-tech space, energy and medical industries: strengths that Scotland and Houston share,” he said.
“The direct engagement of universities such as Glasgow, Strathclyde and Rice create additional opportunities for promoting innovation in research and education.”
The agreement will see customers referred between the two spaceports – Prestwick customers who want equatorial or tropical launches will be referred to Houston and Houston customers looking for polar launches referred to the Ayrshire facility.
Scottish Secretary David Mundell added: “This is good news for the future of spaceport development in Scotland and I am pleased to see such momentum behind it.
“The UK Government’s Modern Transport Bill, to be published early next year, will help create the right legal framework for these new developments to progress.
“A British spaceport would represent a new frontier for our country. It would create skilled jobs in a cutting-edge industry, and today’s announcement means Prestwick is a frontrunner to boldly go at the forefront of this exciting new era of travel.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here