Skip to content

NASA estimates its lunar landing mission will cost up to $30 billion over the next 5 years

NASA Administrator Jim Bridenstine delivers remarks during Space Technology Day at the Florida Institute of Technology, in Melbourne, Fla., Thursday, May 23, 2019.(Joe Burbank/Orlando Sentinel)   3080694
Joe Burbank / Orlando Sentinel
NASA Administrator Jim Bridenstine delivers remarks during Space Technology Day at the Florida Institute of Technology, in Melbourne, Fla., Thursday, May 23, 2019.(Joe Burbank/Orlando Sentinel) 3080694
Author
PUBLISHED: | UPDATED:

NASA has finally assigned a sticker price to its ambitious plan to return astronauts to the lunar surface in the next five years.

Speaking to CNN Business, NASA Administrator Jim Bridenstine said the agency will need an estimated $20 billion to $30 billion by 2024 to deliver Americans to the moon for the first time in about 50 years. Split over the next five years, that would add about $4 billion to $6 billion each year, on average, to NASA’s budget.

To get it off the ground, NASA has already requested a $1.6 billion increase to its $20 billion fiscal year 2020 budget but has been reluctant to give a full cost for the entire program, known as Artemis — a callback to the Apollo program that first sent humans to the moon in 1969.

The $20 billion to $30 billion is the first estimate NASA has offered publicly, though it could still change, Bridenstine told CNN. NASA is currently negotiating “within the administration,” he said.

“Once we come to a determination within the administration, we will of course take that over to the Hill and make sure that our members of Congress are interested and willing to support that effort,” Bridenstine said.

The agency has an uphill battle ahead of it to ensure it reaches its deadline of a 2024 lunar landing. In the past, moonshots have been the victim of uneven political support and inadequate funding. None has succeeded in returning humans to the moon since the final Apollo lunar landing in 1972. In the 1960s, a Cold War climate and an inflated budget — at its peak, the NASA budget was more than 4% of the federal budget when today it’s less than 1% — catapulted America to the moon.

Today, the program is plagued with challenges. The rocket that will send astronauts to the moon is over budget and behind schedule. The lunar space station that will act as a staging area for the trip to the surface has not been built. And just last week, President Trump tweeted that NASA “should NOT be talking about going to the Moon” but rather focusing on its long-term goal of going to Mars.

But NASA has outlined that going to the moon is a critical step before going to Mars, allowing the agency to test several technologies that could be scaled for a trip to Mars.

Bridenstine told CNN he thinks he’ll ultimately be able to get Congress to support the moon mission.

“I think there is a strong desire,” he said. “It’s bipartisan to explore, to learn, to understand the science and the history of our own solar system.”

Want more space news? Follow Go For Launch on Facebook. Contact the reporter at cherrera@orlandosentinel.com or 407-420-5660; Twitter @ChabeliH